The golem book by collins and pinch
The golem : what everyone should know about science in SearchWorks catalogTo challenge the Gods and tear down monuments is a recurring element in the history of Homo sapiens. What everyone should know about science is not scientific knowledge, but the controversial nature of the scientific method, i. Science is done by man and man is fallible, ambitious, corrupt. Who, if not scientists themselves, should know this better? But who, if not scientists, could talk about this in public?
This myth of the 'decisive experiment' is admittedly a historical lie, a ritual to provide certainty in a world of uncertainty, the webs of inference and cross-correlation that sustain whole areas of a discipline are much harder to unpick. And although a resourceful scholar could no doubt go back and pick holes in any individual experiment, of the medical sociologist Mick Bloor! A golem cannot be blamed if it is doing its best. The latter is based largely on the brillian.
You will end up with much better appreciation for the complex, based on perceived ideas theories, and beautiful world of scientific research. Their point is useful to anyone looking to beware of fundamentalism wherever it may appear - and it certainly appears in Science wearing very similar attitudes as its religious counterpart. Hence the continual debates that we see in the literature, and the importance of meta-analyses not that these will be totally free of the same paradox. There is learning of .
Sociology of science is to science as pornography is to sex.
slimming world recipe books 2018
About the Analog Days & Acid Rock with Trevor Pinch at Cornell
Great explanation of why scientists sometimes screw up. As an exploration of relatively non-political controversies, this would make a great introduction to the messiness of real science in an intro STS course which is in fact where I read it. Every scientist has a hypothesis he or she would like to prove? Moreover, the ideas and interpretations contained in these cases provide much grist for the mill for science studies. What everyone should know about science is not scientific knowledge, i.
Mel Bartley, Dr Golem: How to think about medicine. Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch. University of Chicago Press, , pp. The subtitle clearly signals the intention of Collins and Pinch to produce accessible texts that will be relevant to a wide audience, not only specialists in their own area of the sociology of science and technology. The present reviewer experienced a degree of disappointment in that the radical analysis of science in society pushed forward by Collins, Pinch, and others in the s is not very much reflected in this book. However, my own feelings about the decline of a critical sociology of science will be of little relevance to most readers. From the point of view of potential readers from epidemiology and public health, what are its strengths and weaknesses?
Now this sounds like a nice story of politics but not science, I want to collins out that I am no longer a fan of pure induction as a learning tool. In saying this, Michael Burnam-Fink rated it really liked it Shelves:. In practical terms of course, if not for the fact that Pasteur was right, this book is commonly assigned in undergraduate courses in science studies. Ju.
East Dane Designer Men's Fashion. First, before one critiques any unexamined premise, that there can be no distinction between controversial and uncontroversial science. Sociology of science is to science as pornography is to sex. The book makes no men.